Ending The Texas Chili Controversy: Beans Or No Beans
There is a long-lasting debate in the Lone Star State that involves one of the greatest dishes ever made. For generations, people have been arguing over whether or not beans belong in chili. It's time we settle the debate in Texas once and for all.
Do Beans Even Belong In Chili In The First Place?
First, before anyone gets worked up, beans can be added to a pot of chili. It makes the flavor of the chili more complex, adds texture, and most importantly, it makes the chili go further when serving it to multiple people.
READ MORE: Things You Need To Understand About Texas Before Coming Here
Adding beans to chili is something that was born out of necessity. It's cheaper to add beans to a pot of chili than it is to add more meat when times are tough. Fortunately, it doesn't taste bad. Beans in chili can be found in most of the states neighboring Texas.
So why is it so hotly debated in the Lone Star State? It all starts with a cowboy tradition. It's supposed to be a hearty, spicy meal "meant for hard-working people".
If There Are Beans In It, It Isn't Chili In The Lone Star State
Chili in Texas is pretty simple. It's beef and chili paste. Texas-style chili should be meaty and spicy. Those who prefer it this way feel that the beans water down the flavor of the meat and the spiciness of the chilis.
There's no room to budge on this recipe. I've searched high and low for someone willing to break from the simple, basic building blocks of Texas chili, and there's no one out there adding beans to the mix. It seems that the jury is in, and beans don't belong in chili.
The next time you make a pot of chili and some Texan asks if there are beans in it, don't take it personally. They're just making sure you're doing it right.
LOOK: Do You Know the Signature Dish in Each State?
Gallery Credit: Stacker